Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Monteban vs Daniel Windahl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Monteban vs Windahl analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Monteban vs Daniel Windahl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Monteban 1 - 0 Windahl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Monteban has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Windahl has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Monteban, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Windahl has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Monteban has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Windahl has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Monteban has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Windahl winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Monteban has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 31/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Windahl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 19/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Monteban winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Monteban winning 2 and Windahl winning 0. The last match between Monteban and Windahl was at the Netherlands F1, 14-06-2016, First, Clay with Paul Monteban getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Monteban and Windahl have played a deciding set 0 times, with Monteban winning 0 times and Windahl 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Monteban winning 0, and Windahl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Monteban has played against opponents with an average rank of while Windahl has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Monteban has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Windahl has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Monteban has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Windahl has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
815
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
825
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
53% (66-58)
Career Total W/L
59% (62-43)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,425
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Paul Monteban | Daniel Windahl |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (27/52) | 58% (39/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (19/27) | 62% (24/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (16/25) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (31/67) | 33% (17/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Paul Monteban
Player
Daniel Windahl
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Monteban | Daniel Windahl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Paul Monteban Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nico Mertens
Player
Paul Monteban
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Monteban
Player
Masayoshi Ono
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Paul Monteban
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Monteban
Player
Gijs Brouwer
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Vandenbulcke
Player
Paul Monteban
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Ruepke
Player
Paul Monteban
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Daniel Windahl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Monteban
Player
Daniel Windahl
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Daniel Windahl
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
77%
(
80 of
104)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Windahl
Player
Piotr Zbroja
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julien Cagnina
Player
Daniel Windahl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Dubarenco
Player
Daniel Windahl
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Daniel Windahl
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 |
Stats
Konstantin Kravchuk
Player
Daniel Windahl
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Daniel Windahl
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Daniel Windahl
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Monteban Vs Windahl Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
